Page 1 of 2

Landstalker thread/topic

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:25 pm
by Zucca
For those who haven't played it - you should.
It's like Zelda, but in isometric graphics.

Reason for this topic is that I made a screenshot gallery, but be warned, as I tried not to include much spoilers, some might think otherwise. Gallery is just to familiarize you with the game.
Note: this game come from the creators of the original Shining Series!

Wing-0 ...!

And of course, discussion is always welcome. ;)

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:07 pm
by Wing-0
Uh, what? Oh!

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:12 pm
by Edge
I actually owned this game on the real console back when I had one still... I never beat it though... I forget what it was, but something held me back from it near the start of the game. God knows what it was... Maybe I'll take another go at it... God knows, I love the Shining series.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:18 pm
by IndispensablePeaGuy
Note: this game come from the creators of the Shining Series!


Wrong. The actual creators are Camelot (originally called Sonic Software Planning). Climax collaborated only on the first two Shining games.

I haven't touched a Shining game in years because of how badly Sega treated its creators. My love for the series died after SF3 was released

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:28 pm
by Semix
Well that took a while to load, and scroll down xD

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:36 am
by Zucca
Peegai wrote:
Note: this game come from the creators of the Shining Series!


Wrong. The actual creators are Camelot (originally called Sonic Software Planning). Climax collaborated only on the first two Shining games.
I'm correcting already! But wasn't Climax with SitD, SFI and SFII?

Peegai wrote:I haven't touched a Shining game in years because of how badly Sega treated its creators. My love for the series died after SF3 was released
SFIII was bad? I haven't played it... yet.
At least Shining the Holy Ark was playable.

Semix wrote:Well that took a while to load, and scroll down xD
Yeah. it's 1.2Mb html file with embedded images.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:21 am
by skymandr
Ah! Great game! I played it back in the 90s, but never finished it, since there was a passage that the emulators of the day couldn't handle.

Maybe I should give it another go...

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:35 am
by IndispensablePeaGuy
Zucca, I meant that anything after SF3, the Shining series sucked. SF3 was the last true Shining Force game for me.

Climax helped with the first two games. SF2 and onwards were made by Camelot. SF3 was their last game.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:24 pm
by Zucca
Yeah. This 2000's never saw any good Shining games. :\

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:40 pm
by Wing-0
AmI weird for liking Neo and Exa?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:33 pm
by BenoitRen
Zucca, I question your method of delivery for these screenshots. Not only do you have them embedded in the HTML encoded as base64 (which inflates their size 1,3x), but you've scaled them to double their resolution, making them even bigger. People should be able to enlarge the screenshots on their own.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:52 pm
by Zucca
BenoitRen wrote:Zucca, I question your method of delivery for these screenshots. Not only do you have them embedded in the HTML encoded as base64 (which inflates their size 1,3x), but you've scaled them to double their resolution, making them even bigger. People should be able to enlarge the screenshots on their own.
  • I had to upload these shots in one file, and I knew about the file size problem (compressed acrhive would have been another choice, but not as user friendly as this) + with current internet connection speeds 1.3 Mb isn't that bad download, especially when you can already look the first pictures while the others are downloading (progressive)
  • I haven't scaled the size of these images (look the source again, or right-click on image --> open image in new tab/window)


This is why I would, so much, like to see some kind of bzippped/lzma2'd-html-file standard.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:56 pm
by BenoitRen
Not everyone has broadband today, unfortunately. And anyone who is unfortunate to use IE won't see any images.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 3:02 pm
by Zucca
Yeah. IE is the problem (32bytes/kbytes limit?). But I took that on account as I know that many of us on this board uses some other browser than IE (because we are not stupid people).
IE causes problems for me every day.
I can't understand why MS sticks to their own non-standard browser policies...

Which brings one question into my mind... Is there a standard "web archive" format? I guess not. At least any user friendly (openable by browser)?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:59 pm
by IndispensablePeaGuy
WING-0 wrote:AmI weird for liking Neo and Exa?

Like what you want. Moogie's site can't be arsed with the new games.